When preparing a patent application, especially after collaborative research and development involving multiple stakeholders, considering a "joint application" seems natural. However, in practice, situations often arise where joint applications are actively discouraged. What are the reasons behind this? This column explores the core reasons why joint patent applications are generally avoided and the associated points of caution.
Understanding Joint Applications (Joint Patents)
- Joint Application: The process where two or more applicants file together for a patent and receive registration for the same invention.
- Joint Patent (Co-owned Patent): A patent resulting from a joint application, where the rights to the invention are shared.
- Scope of Rights: In a joint application, co-inventors or co-applicants legally hold a single patent right "jointly," rather than possessing "divided" portions of the patent right.
The nature of joint applications, where each participant shares the 'same patent right' rather than a mere portion, often complicates matters related to ownership shares (stakes) and the exercise of rights.
Key Reasons Why Joint Applications Are Discouraged
- Complexity in Exercising and Managing Rights
- Decision-Making Delays: Important decisions regarding patent licensing, technology transfer, or litigation often require unanimous agreement among all co-applicants. This can significantly hinder timely decision-making.
- Increased Management Costs: Ambiguity in how patent maintenance fees or dispute resolution costs are shared can easily lead to conflicts.
- Risk of Disputes: If even one co-applicant disagrees, conflicts over patent utilization strategies or litigation policies can escalate significantly.
- Conflicts of Interest Regarding Technology Rights
- Licensing Issues: With co-owned patents, situations can arise (depending on national laws) where each co-owner might theoretically license their share to a third party. If one co-owner grants a license to a third party without prior agreement, it could potentially undermine the interests of the other co-owners.
- Confusion Over Rights Attribution: If contributions during the R&D phase are not clearly distinguished, failing to precisely define rights ownership at the time of application significantly increases the likelihood of future disputes.
- Corporate Strategy and Subsequent R&D Issues
- Strategy for Securing Sole Intellectual Property: From a corporate perspective, sole applications are often preferred to exercise exclusive rights. Joint ownership can dilute this exclusivity.
- Constraints on Further R&D Collaboration: If subsequent technological development is needed after the patent application, the co-ownership status can further complicate the attribution of rights for new inventions arising from individual R&D efforts.
- Litigation and Liability Issues
- Scope of Liability in Legal Disputes: In infringement lawsuits or invalidity actions, unclear role division among co-applicants makes it difficult to clearly assign liability.
- Cost Issues: Litigation costs may need to be borne jointly, or one specific applicant might have to bear them initially, necessitating thorough prior agreement.
How to Prepare if a Joint Application is Unavoidable?
- Execute a Prior Agreement
- It is essential to draft and sign an agreement clearly defining the rights and obligations of each applicant before filing a joint patent application.
- Include detailed clauses concerning licensing, apportionment of patent maintenance fees, litigation cost sharing, and procedures for the assignment or disposal of rights.
- Clarify Ownership Shares and Decision-Making Structure
- Consider quantifying the shares among co-applicants or specifying decision-making authority.
- Establishing one co-applicant as a representative can facilitate the efficient handling of practical matters.
- Consider Sole Application Followed by Licensing (Alternative Approach)
- A common alternative involves the entity or individual holding the core technology filing a sole application and then granting rights to other stakeholders through licensing or equity investment arrangements.
- This clarifies decision-making regarding the patent right and helps prevent unnecessary disputes.
- Seek Expert Consultation
- Joint applications involve numerous legal and contractual complexities. We strongly recommend obtaining advice from a specialist patent attorney.
Concluding Remarks
Patent rights are a crucial tool for protecting technological capabilities, but the complexities arising from joint applications can pose significant risks. The potential for high dispute costs and decision-making delays can greatly diminish the ability to fully leverage the patent's value. Therefore, if a joint application is unavoidable, it is critical to minimize potential conflicts by executing prior agreements, designing a clear decision-making structure, and seeking expert advice.
Pine IP Firm has extensive experience in patent prosecution and a wealth of know-how in litigation and consulting, enabling us to support clients with optimal patent strategies tailored to their needs. If you are contemplating a joint patent application, please do not hesitate to contact Pine IP Firm anytime.
.png)
